Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Landlord & Tenant Law
Insurance Failure Precludes Exercise of Purchase Option
455 Dumont Associates LLC v. Rule Realty Corp. NYLJ 2/18/20, p. 37, col. 1 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In commercial tenant's action for declaratory and injunctive relief, tenant appealed from Supreme Court's declaration that tenant had no legal interest in the real property. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that tenant's failure to procure insurance entitled landlord to terminate the lease and prevent tenant from exercising its option to purchase the property.
The parties entered into a lease for a period beginning Oct. 1, 2004 and ending on Sept. 30, 2015. The lease required tenant to purchase $2,000,000 in insurance coverage, and to provide proof of coverage to landlord. The lease also gave tenant an option to purchase the property. In three letters dated in early 2014, landlord notified tenant that it was in default for failure to procure the requisite insurance coverage. Those letters were followed by a letter dated April 30, 2014 informing tenant that the lease would be terminated as of May 8, 2014. On July 25, 2014, tenant commenced this action for a declaration that the lease had not been validly terminated and that tenant was entitled to exercise its option to purchase. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to landlord and declared that tenant had no interest in the property. Tenant appealed.
In affirming, the Appellate Division started by holding that failure to provide the required insurance was a material breach of the lease, and was an obligation separate and apart from tenant's obligation to indemnify landlord. The court then rejected tenant's argument that landlord had waived compliance with the insurance obligation by accepting rent for years without objecting. The court relied on a lease provision specifying that failure to enforce a condition in the lease did not constitute a waiver, and the court went on to hold that mere negligence or oversight by landlord would not operate as a waiver. Because landlord properly exercised its right to terminate the lease before tenant exercised its purchase option, tenant could no longer exercise the option, leaving tenant with no interest in the subject property.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders
Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?