Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
455 Dumont Associates LLC v. Rule Realty Corp. NYLJ 2/18/20, p. 37, col. 1 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In commercial tenant's action for declaratory and injunctive relief, tenant appealed from Supreme Court's declaration that tenant had no legal interest in the real property. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that tenant's failure to procure insurance entitled landlord to terminate the lease and prevent tenant from exercising its option to purchase the property.
The parties entered into a lease for a period beginning Oct. 1, 2004 and ending on Sept. 30, 2015. The lease required tenant to purchase $2,000,000 in insurance coverage, and to provide proof of coverage to landlord. The lease also gave tenant an option to purchase the property. In three letters dated in early 2014, landlord notified tenant that it was in default for failure to procure the requisite insurance coverage. Those letters were followed by a letter dated April 30, 2014 informing tenant that the lease would be terminated as of May 8, 2014. On July 25, 2014, tenant commenced this action for a declaration that the lease had not been validly terminated and that tenant was entitled to exercise its option to purchase. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to landlord and declared that tenant had no interest in the property. Tenant appealed.
In affirming, the Appellate Division started by holding that failure to provide the required insurance was a material breach of the lease, and was an obligation separate and apart from tenant's obligation to indemnify landlord. The court then rejected tenant's argument that landlord had waived compliance with the insurance obligation by accepting rent for years without objecting. The court relied on a lease provision specifying that failure to enforce a condition in the lease did not constitute a waiver, and the court went on to hold that mere negligence or oversight by landlord would not operate as a waiver. Because landlord properly exercised its right to terminate the lease before tenant exercised its purchase option, tenant could no longer exercise the option, leaving tenant with no interest in the subject property.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.