Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Federal Crackdown on Hoarding and Gouging During COVID-19 Crisis

By Marjorie Peerce and Justin Kerner
May 01, 2020

Imagine that it's Spring 2020 and you run a warehousing company, in which it is common for your customers to store container-loads of goods in both the short-term (while awaiting a move to the container's next destination) and long-term (perhaps while the entity holding title to the goods in the container finds a buyer). Now imagine you discover that your warehouse contains containers of goods that could help combat the spread of the COVID-19 virus — masks, medical gowns, gloves or other personal protective equipment (PPE).

Or imagine this slightly different scenario: You own a trucking company and learn that your drivers are delivering pallets of hand sanitizer and disinfectants to a residential address. Perhaps they have delivered several pallets in a single delivery, or they are repeatedly bringing goods to the same place.

What, if any, obligations might you have in these scenarios? And importantly, what, if any, liability might you have if it turns out a customer is hoarding PPE?

Today's Legal Landscape

The possibility of these types of scenarios is all too real, and so are the potential criminal and civil penalties that could flow forth from them. The Defense Production Act of 1950 (50 U.S.C. §4512) generally prohibits individuals and entities from hoarding materials that have been deemed to be scarce, or which would be made scarce by hoarding. Specifically, it prohibits accumulation of such materials "in excess of the reasonable demands of business, personal, or home consumption" or if such accumulation is "for the purpose of resale at prices in excess of prevailing market prices." 50 U.S.C. §4512. Recently, an Executive Order (Executive Order 13910) was issued under which several categories of goods have been designated as "scarce" or "threatened." They include, among other things:

  • N-95 respirators, other respirators, and component parts;
  • Portable ventilators, stationary ventilators, and other positive pressure breathing devices modified for use as ventilators;
  • Drug products in which the active ingredient is either chloroquine phosphate or hydroxychloroquine HCl;
  • Sterilizers;
  • Disinfectant products;
  • Medical gowns and apparel;
  • PPE coveralls, face masks, face shields, and gloves; and
  • Surgical gloves.

Items designated as "scarce" have been determined to be critical so that the government and society are equipped "to respond to the spread of COVID-19." (Department of Health and Human Services, Notice of Designation of Scarce Materials or Threatened Materials Subject to COVID-19 Hoarding Prevention Measures Under Executive Order 13910 and Section 102 of the Defense Production Act of 1950.) And they have been determined to be in short supply, to likely be in short supply, or to otherwise be the types of goods for which supply "would be threatened by hoarding." Id.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.