Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Agreement to Amend CA's AB5 Helps Music Industry

By Sidney S. Fohrman and Ariel D. Shpigel
June 01, 2020

On Sept. 18, 2019, Assembly Bill Number 5 (AB5) became law in California, paving the way for dramatic changes in California's gig economy. AB5 was designed to provide labor protections for "misclassified independent contractors," including the application of minimum wage laws, overtime, sick leave requirements, and unemployment and worker's compensation. Once put into practice, however, AB5's negative impacts on industries that rely substantially on an independent contractor workforce quickly became illuminated. After over a year-and-a-half of lobbying efforts by the music industry and negotiations with lawmakers, it was recently announced that AB5 would be amended to accommodate musicians' unique niche in the California economy.

AB5, which added §2750.3 to the California Labor Code, codified Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018), a California Supreme Court case which used the "ABC test" to classify an individual as an employee or independent contractor. While the previous S.G. Borello & Sons Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 48 Cal. 3d 341 (1989), test used in California placed the burden of proof on the employee to prove misclassification using a variety of flexible, discretionary factors, the ABC test shifted the burden of proof to the employer and created a presumption of employee status.

The ABC test, as outlined in AB5, requires an employer to establish three different factors to prove that an employee is an independent contractor:

  1. The worker is free from the control and direction of the employer in the performance of his or her work;
  2. The worker's work is outside the usual course of the employer's business; and
  3. The worker is customarily engaged in an independently established trade, occupation or a business of the same nature as that involved in the work performed.

AB5 carves out exceptions when the less stringent Borello test should be applied. AB5 exempts some occupations that provide "professional services" (e.g., attorneys, architects and fine artists). It allows freelance photographers and journalists to act as independent contractors as long as they contribute fewer than 35 pieces per year to a publication. AB5 also contains a provision establishing an exception for business-to-business contracts. Since AB5's codification, lawyers have debated some of the ambiguities inherent in these provisions, such as how to define a "fine artist" and whether AB5 will affect the use of loan-outs.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.