Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Sept. 18, 2019, Assembly Bill Number 5 (AB5) became law in California, paving the way for dramatic changes in California's gig economy. AB5 was designed to provide labor protections for "misclassified independent contractors," including the application of minimum wage laws, overtime, sick leave requirements, and unemployment and worker's compensation. Once put into practice, however, AB5's negative impacts on industries that rely substantially on an independent contractor workforce quickly became illuminated. After over a year-and-a-half of lobbying efforts by the music industry and negotiations with lawmakers, it was recently announced that AB5 would be amended to accommodate musicians' unique niche in the California economy.
AB5, which added §2750.3 to the California Labor Code, codified Dynamex Operations West Inc. v. Superior Court, 4 Cal. 5th 903 (2018), a California Supreme Court case which used the "ABC test" to classify an individual as an employee or independent contractor. While the previous S.G. Borello & Sons Inc. v. Department of Industrial Relations, 48 Cal. 3d 341 (1989), test used in California placed the burden of proof on the employee to prove misclassification using a variety of flexible, discretionary factors, the ABC test shifted the burden of proof to the employer and created a presumption of employee status.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.