Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Baychester Retail III LLC v. Perlmutter NYLJ 3/23/20, p. 18, col. 6 AppDiv, First Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In an article 78 proceeding challenging the Board of Standards and Appeals' denial of a permit for an advertising sign, applicant appealed from Supreme Court's denial of the petition and dismissal of the proceeding. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that BSA's determination to treat multiple panels as a single sign was not arbitrary and capricious.
Applicant sought a permit to install 27 panels separately affixed to a single monopole which, together, would project a single advertisement more than 9,000 square feet in area. The advertisement was to be illuminated and displayed near the New England Thruway in the vicinity of co-op city. The Board of Standards and Appeals concluded that the panels should be treated as a single structure violating restrictions on the size of advertising signs. Applicant brought this article 78 proceeding, and Supreme Court dismissed the proceeding.
In affirming, the Appellate Division concluded that the BSA rationally found that applicant's resulting massive illuminated sign would be a hazard to motorists. The court held that the BSA had rationally distinguished other multi-panel signs that had been treated as multiple signs.
*****
|Matter of Hampshire Recreation, LLC v. Village of Mamaroneck NYLJ 3/27/20 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)
In a hybrid action/article 78 proceeding challenging the village board's refusal to rezone property, the village appealed from Supreme Court's denial of its motion to dismiss. The Appellate Division reversed and dismissed the claims, holding that the village's actions were not subject to review under article 78.
Landowner applied to rezone its property to an open space/residential district. The village board declined to consider the application. Six months later, landowner again applied for a rezoning, and the village board again declined to consider the application. Landowner then brought this proceeding seeking to annul the village board's decision. Supreme Court denied the village's motion and the village appealed.
In reversing, the Appellate Division held that amendment of a zoning ordinance is a purely legislative function and that the village board was not obligated to consider and vote upon every application for a zoning change. As a result, the village's actions in this case were beyond judicial review, and the village was entitled to dismissal.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.