Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Corporate legal departments may be using downtime enforced by COVID-19-related shutdowns to reevaluate their approach to e-discovery. Those discussions are likely to revolve around whether it's more cost-effective to handle e-discovery-related tasks such as collections or processing in-house, or attempt to renegotiate contracts with vendors weathering the same injured economy.
Before the outbreak of COVID-19, the answer would probably have been more straightforward. Recent trends suggest that legal departments were taking more control over the e-discovery process by moving those functions in-house to increase long-term savings. Last October, Exterro's 2019 In-House Legal Benchmark Report showed that 50% of respondents had a formal or informal e-discovery team. But could potential COVID-19-related layoffs or financial hardships make it harder for legal departments to maintain that trend?
Cybersecurity Law & Strategy Board of Editors member, Brett Burney of Burney Consultants, doesn't foresee companies reversing course on in-house e-discovery operations anytime soon. "Honestly, I expect the trend to continue. I think it will continue to be insourcing. I think this is just a little bit of a blip on the radar and I at least haven't seen that this is forcing anybody to make a different decision," Burney says.
A big part of that may have to do with the employees typically responsible for performing e-discovery-related functions inside corporate legal departments. According to Burney, the burden of those chores tends to fall on paralegals and company information technology professionals, who often serve a multitude of other important support roles within an organization or legal department in addition to their e-discovery workload.
However, some organizations may also be treating COVID-19's sluggish effect on litigation as a window to reevaluate their approach to e-discovery, which is difficult to do when business-related legal needs are in full swing. Burney has heard from clients who see a chance to reconnect with outside providers at a more favorable price point.
"At this point in time, they see it as an opportunity to maybe take advantage of getting those service providers and talking them down [and] striking a bargain on those services," Burney says.
It's not entirely out of the realm of possibility. Some e-discovery providers have already felt the impact of COVID-19 on the world market. DISCO, for example, confirmed to Law.com in April that it had made an undisclosed number of cuts to its workforce in an effort to offset the effects of an economic downturn. But just how far even the most nervous e-discovery providers may be willing to bend in negotiations with corporate legal departments remains a question mark.
Mary Mack, CEO and chief legal technologist at EDRM, has not heard of any providers signing off on lower fees just yet, but she has seen some flexibility emerge around payment terms. For example, an e-discovery vendor may agree to significantly extend the number of days a client has to pay an invoice for a piece of software or other services before it is declared past due and begins accruing interest.
Still, Mack doesn't think that bargaining around lower fees is completely out of the question moving forward as e-discovery providers look to preserve their own ongoing business and cash flow. "If you are a provider, whether you are a law firm or a platform or an alternative legal services provider, at this point it wouldn't be client-centered not to look at what you arranged to do in the best of times and make some adjustments," she says.
*****
Frank Ready is a reporter on the tech desk at ALM Media. He can be reached at [email protected].
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.