Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
"I want them out!" When a tenant stops paying rent, landlords usually have this reaction. But what about those tenants faithfully paying rent while breaching other provisions of the lease? Landlords often believe adherence to these non-monetary provisions are just as important as collecting rent because these provisions allow landlords to ensure that their property is properly maintained.
Landlords may want to evict a tenant for a non-monetary default. Unfortunately, this may prove difficult. Judges quickly evict tenants that fail to pay rent, but, when asked to evict a tenant for a non-monetary default, judges may refuse. This is understandable. Florida statutes are clear on relief for monetary defaults, leaving courts with little analysis to perform; however, there is not much guidance on relief for non-monetary defaults. Instead, courts are required to act in equity, which by its nature is imprecise. This article examines the eviction of a commercial tenant for non-monetary defaults. Because landlord/tenant law is highly state specific, this article focuses on non-monetary defaults in Florida.
In Florida, landlord/tenant law is governed by statute. Part I of Florida Statutes Chapter 83 governs nonresidential tenancies (§§83.001 – 83.251). This chapter contains only one subsection that explicitly addresses non-monetary defaults. Florida Statute §83.20(3) requires the landlord to give its tenant written notice when the tenant has materially breached the lease in some non-monetary way. Florida Statute § 83.20(3) states that a tenant may be removed from the premises:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.