Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania decided that state right of publicity claims should be dismissed under the Communications Decency Act (CDA), 47 U.S.C. §230. Hepp v. Facebook Inc., 19-4034. Philadelphia TV news personality Karen Hepp had brought common law and statutory right of publicity claims, alleging that "without her consent, a photograph of her taken by a security camera in a convenience store in New York City was being used in online advertisements for erectile dysfunction and dating websites." Section 230 states: "No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider." But the CDA provides an exception from this online immunity for claims based on "any law pertaining to intellectual property." District Judge John Milton Younge found the intellectual property laws immunity exception applied to federal, not to state, laws, by noting: "State laws that could arguably be construed as implicating 'intellectual property' vary and are not uniform in their purposes and policy goals. Conditioning CDA immunity on the diverse potentially applicable state laws would have a negative effect on the development of the internet, and, therefore, would run contrary to the purpose and intent of the CDA."
*****
|The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the dismissal of a defamation action brought against production and distribution defendants over the movie The Wolf of Wall Street. Greene v. Paramount Pictures Corp., 19-135. The film, starring Leonard DiCaprio and directed by Martin Scorsese, was based on a memoir by Jordan Belfort, co-founder of the discredited securities firm Stratton Oakmont. Plaintiff Andrew Greene — who worked at Stratton Oakmont as general counsel and corporate finance head, and was a key, unflattering character in Belfort's book — alleged he was defamed in the movie by being "Nicky Koskoff," who the defendants argued was a composite character of several Stratton Oakmont employees. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted summary judgment for the defendants by finding they "did not act with knowledge or reckless disregard for whether Koskoff was 'of and concerning' Plaintiff, and thus, that they did not act with actual malice." In its affirmance, the Second Circuit noted of the vetting process for the film: "[D]efendants' representatives spoke to a number of people, including Belfort, and read the Book and numerous news accounts of the events depicted in the Film. They spoke to screenwriter Terence Winter, who advised that he had reduced 'the number of characters [featured in the Book] by creating various composite characters who did not correspond to any single human being." The appeal court further found: "[N]o reasonable viewer of the Film would believe that defendants intended the Koskoff character to be a depiction of Greene. The most obvious point is that there is no character named Andrew Greene … in the Film. Moreover, the record shows that defendants knew that the Koskoff character was a fictitious character who was a composite of three different people depicted in the Book. For example, in the Film the Koskoff character worked as a broker at Stratton who works on the trading floor. Greene, on the other hand, was the head of the Corporate Finance Department who did not work on the trading floor." The Second Circuit then pointed to the film's "disclaimer making clear that characters in the Film are fictionalized."
*****
Stan Soocher is Editor-in-Chief of Entertainment Law & Finance and Professor of Music & Entertainment Studies at the University of Colorado's Denver Campus. He is also an entertainment attorney, as well as author of the books Baby You're a Rich Man: Suing the Beatles for Fun & Profit and They Fought the Law: Rock Music Goes to Court, the latter which is available in an updated, expanded edition in Amazon's Kindle Store. For more information: www.stansoocher.com.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.