Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The biggest challenge with any legal hold process is ensuring that potentially relevant data is actually preserved. There are myriad routes you can take to ensure defensible preservation of data, starting with the following three options:
But with evolving requirements for how data is managed by new data privacy laws like the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), it's become harder to secure data by simply sending a legal hold and assuming the custodian will do their duty to preserve it.
Key features of the CCPA and GDPR grant consumers and employees unprecedented rights — including the right to request to know what data a business holds on them and ask that it be deleted. But what if that data requested under these regulations is already required to be saved under a legal hold?
Obviously, deleting data that is this potentially relevant to anticipated or pending litigation (civil or criminal) can have devastating consequences. Therefore, it's imperative that e-discovery professionals collaborate with their privacy colleagues on processes for harmonizing their organizational legal hold obligations with these conflicting data privacy regulations.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.