Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An Ounce of Prevention: Preparing for CARES Act Fraud Investigations
The $2 trillion economic relief package from Congress' Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act has been steadily infused into our economy since March. One well-known example of these stimulus funds is the Small Business Administration's (SBA) Paycheck Protection Program (PPP), through which over 4.9 million businesses received $521 billion in forgivable loans to help maintain payroll, rehire employees and cover rent and utilities. Compared to other government-backed loan programs, the speed with which lenders processed and approved PPP applications was unprecedented.
Early on, the government made clear its commitment to rooting out fraudsters attempting to pilfer PPP funds. In late April, Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin said the SBA would conduct a full audit of PPP loans over $2 million prior to forgiveness and that borrowers may face criminal liability if they make false loan certifications. Based on loan data released by the SBA and Treasury Department (as of June 30), a modest number of the 4.9 million PPP loans fall above the $2 million mark — approximately 294,000, or 0.6%. But the value of these loans is significant — over $10 billion — and underscores the importance of government monitoring and enforcement.
The government appears to be fulfilling its commitment to rooting out PPP fraud, even when the amount at issue falls below the $2 million threshold. On July 13, the Department of Justice announced charges against the owner of a Washington, DC-based residential construction contracting firm for allegedly submitting a fraudulent tax return and bogus Social Security numbers for fake independent contractors when applying for a $400,000 PPP loan. Similar cases have been brought against business owners in other parts of the country, including Georgia ($2 million loan), Florida ($22,000 loan) and Texas ($1.1 million loan). Notably, the SBA's Office of Inspector General worked closely with DOJ on these prosecutions, showing close coordination between the agencies for PPP-related fraud.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?