Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sutton Apartments Corp. v. Zanani NYLJ 5/7/20, p. 17, col. 1, AppTerm, First Dept. (per curiam opinion)
In the co-op corporation's holdover proceeding, shareholder appealed from Supreme Court's award of possession to the co-op corporation. The Appellate Term reversed and dismissed the petition, holding that shareholder did not breach his survival of closing affidavit or his proprietary lease.
Upon the closing of his purchase of an apartment in the co-op, shareholder was required to tender a bank check in the amount of $122,606.03 to the city's Housing Development Corporation. Shareholder tendered the check, and the co-op forwarded it to HDC by messenger, but HDC never received the check. One year later, the co-op informed shareholder that HDC was requesting a replacement. His ban would not stop payment on the original check unless he executed an affidavit indicating that the check was lost stolen or destroyed. Because shareholder, a lawyer, did not have personal knowledge about the facts regarding loss of the check, he requested that HDC execute a lost check affidavit, but HDC refused. As a result, shareholder did not tender a replacement check. The co-op corporation then brought this holdover proceeding, alleging that shareholder's failure to tender a replacement check constituted a breach of a "survival of closing" affidavit, which constituted a default under the proprietary lease. Civil Court awarded a summary judgment of possession to the co-op corporation, holding that shareholder had breached the survival of closing affidavit when he stopped payment on the original check without tendering a replacement check.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.