Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sutton Apartments Corp. v. Zanani NYLJ 5/7/20, p. 17, col. 1, AppTerm, First Dept. (per curiam opinion)
In the co-op corporation's holdover proceeding, shareholder appealed from Supreme Court's award of possession to the co-op corporation. The Appellate Term reversed and dismissed the petition, holding that shareholder did not breach his survival of closing affidavit or his proprietary lease.
Upon the closing of his purchase of an apartment in the co-op, shareholder was required to tender a bank check in the amount of $122,606.03 to the city's Housing Development Corporation. Shareholder tendered the check, and the co-op forwarded it to HDC by messenger, but HDC never received the check. One year later, the co-op informed shareholder that HDC was requesting a replacement. His ban would not stop payment on the original check unless he executed an affidavit indicating that the check was lost stolen or destroyed. Because shareholder, a lawyer, did not have personal knowledge about the facts regarding loss of the check, he requested that HDC execute a lost check affidavit, but HDC refused. As a result, shareholder did not tender a replacement check. The co-op corporation then brought this holdover proceeding, alleging that shareholder's failure to tender a replacement check constituted a breach of a "survival of closing" affidavit, which constituted a default under the proprietary lease. Civil Court awarded a summary judgment of possession to the co-op corporation, holding that shareholder had breached the survival of closing affidavit when he stopped payment on the original check without tendering a replacement check.
In reversing, the Appellate Term noted that the survival of closing affidavit focused on failure to replace checks that failed in collection. In this case, the shareholder's check did not fail in collection, but was never presented for collection because it was lost after the closing through no fault of the shareholder. The court also held that neither stopping payment of the check nor declining to tender a replacement until HDC submitted a lost check affidavit constituted a failure of collection.
|ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.