Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

The Bankruptcy StrategistFeaturesBankruptcyLitigation

Bankruptcy Code Section 502(d) Claim Disallowance Issues 'Travel With' the Claim

By Rudolph J. Di Massa, Jr. and Geoffrey A. Heaton 
September 01, 2020

In a recent decision, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York held that claim disallowance issues under Section 502(d) of the Bankruptcy Code "travel with" the claim, and not with the claimant. Declining to follow a published district court decision from the same federal district, the bankruptcy court found that section 502(d) applies to disallow a transferred claim regardless of whether the transferee acquired its claim through an assignment or an outright sale. See, In re Firestar Diamond, 615 B.R. 161 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2020).

Background

Firestar Diamond, Inc., Fantasy, Inc. and A. Jaffe, Inc. (the debtors) filed for protection under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Southern District of New York. The debtors were jewelry wholesalers that did business with major U.S. retailers. After the filings, an examiner appointed in the debtors' cases found "substantial evidence to support the knowledge and involvement by the debtors and their senior officers and directors" in certain alleged fraudulent conduct. Events flowing from this investigation led to the appointment of a Chapter 11 trustee to administer the debtors' bankruptcy estates.

In the course of their pre-bankruptcy dealings, the debtors incurred accounts payable indebtedness to three non-debtor entities: Firestar Diamond International, Firestar Diamond BVBA, and Firestar Diamond FZE. These nondebtor entities, in turn, had financial dealings with four separate banks. Pursuant to those dealings, the non-debtor entities either: a) pledged to the banks their debtor-related accounts receivable; or b) sold to the banks certain invoices that had been issued to the debtors. The banks had otherwise had no prior direct dealing with either of the debtors.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.