Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Eminent Domain Law
Claimant Must Repay Advance Payment When Judgment Determines That Value Was Smaller Than Advance
Staten Island Land Corp. v. New York City NYLJ 6/2/20 Supreme Ct., Richmond Cty (Saitta, J.)
In an eminent domain proceeding, the city moved for a judgment awarding the city the difference between the advanced payment it made to the claimant and the final value of the property as judicially determined. The court granted the motion, rejecting claimant's contention that a claimant should not be required to pay back an advance payment made by the condemnor.
The city, as condemnor, took title to the property in 2006, and made an advance payment to the landowner of $2,575,700 plus interest from the date of vesting. At trial, landowner sought more, while the city submitted a rebuttal appraisal which valued the property at $1,360,000. The trial court awarded landowner $3,500,000 as the value of the property taken, but the Appellate Division reduced the award to $1,625,888. The city then sought a judgment for the difference between its advanced payment and the award made by the Appellate Division. Landowner resisted, contending that allowing the city to recover part of the advanced payment is inconsistent with the reason for the statutory provision for advance payment, which, according to the landowner, is to allow the landowner to obtain replacement property.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
How Secure Is the AI System Your Law Firm Is Using?
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
COVID-19 and Lease Negotiations: Early Termination Provisions
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
Pleading Importation: ITC Decisions Highlight Need for Adequate Evidentiary Support
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
Authentic Communications Today Increase Success for Value-Driven Clients
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.