Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Facebook filed two separate lawsuits in the UK and U.S. that the company says is part of an ongoing effort to hold developers that abuse its platform accountable.
One lawsuit, filed in the United Kingdom's High Court of Justice, alleges that Fatih Haltas, founder of England-based digital marketing companies MobiBurn and OakSmart Technologies, failed to comply with Facebook's audit request after he allegedly gathered user data by paying app developers to install a "malicious" software development kit in their apps that would mine devices and social media accounts. The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Facebook Inc. and Facebook Ireland.
Facebook's attorneys at White & Case allege that Haltas violated the platform's terms of service by selling Facebook data such as users' name, location, email address and gender, as well as "directly or indirectly transferring data obtained from Facebook to data monetisation services" as far back as April 2018.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?