Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Are Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissals In Copyright Infringement Lawsuits In Danger?
Federal district courts in the U.S. Courts of Appeals for the Second and Ninth Circuits have regularly granted Rule 12(b)(6) dismissals of copyright infringement lawsuits against motion pictures and other literary works if, following review of the works in issue, the court determines the plaintiff cannot plausibly state a claim of copyright infringement because the two works are not substantial similar.
Motions to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are typically confined to the allegations in the pleadings. However, consistent with the law in other circuits, the Second and Ninth Circuits permit consideration of documents incorporated by reference in or integral to the allegations in a complaint in resolving Rule 12(b)(6) motions. See, e.g., Peter F. Gaito Architecture LLC v. Simone Dev. Corp., 602 F.3d 57 (2d Cir. 2010); Knieval v. ESPN, 393 F.3d 1068 (9th Cir. 2005). Under this rule, courts regularly review the allegedly infringed and infringing works on Rule 12(b)(6) motions.
Until recently, the Second and Ninth Circuits have both been receptive to such dismissals. However, a pair of recent "unpublished" Ninth Circuit reversals of Rule 12(b)(6) dismissals involving prominent motion pictures — Zindel v. Fox Searchlight Pictures Inc., 18-56087 (9th Cir. 2020); Alfred, II v. The Walt Disney Co., 19-55669 (9th Cir. 2020) — stand in contrast to a recent Second Circuit decision affirming such a dismissal. (Under Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3, "unpublished" decisions are not precedent for unrelated copyright decisions. However, they may be cited by litigants and may influence how district court judges approach future Rule 12(b)(6) motions.)
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.