Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Co-ops and Condominiums

By ssalkin
October 01, 2020
|

Fine for Refusal to Remove Dogs Upheld Under Business Judgment Rule

Board of Managers of Fishkill Woods Condominium v. Gottlieb NYLJ 6/26/20, p. 27, col. 1 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)

In two consolidated actions, one by condominium board and the other by unit owner, unit owner appealed from Supreme Court's order granting summary judgment to the board declaring that the fine Imposed on unit owner for failure to remove two dogs was lawful and enforceable. The Appellate Division affirmed, relying on the business judgment rule.

The condominium's declaration provides that if any pet becomes a source of unreasonable annoyance, unit owner, upon written notice may be required to remove the pet from the community. Unit owner owns two dogs. In separate incidents in 2014 and 2015, the dogs allegedly attached two neighbors on condominium property. The condominium board then provided unit owner with written notice to remove the doges, and when unit owner failed to do so, the board brought an action seeking an injunction requiring unit owner to remove the dogs, and an award of attorney's fees. Unit owner then commenced an action against the board alleging that the board had unlawfully encumbered the unit with a fine of $100 per day, and sought a judgment declaring that the fine and demand for removal of the dogs were unenforceable. The two actions were consolidated. Supreme Court granted summary judgment to the board on its claim for injunctive relief, and declared that the fine was lawful to the extent the fine was in the sum of $200. The court also awarded attorney's fees in an amount to be determined at a hearing. Unit owner appealed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies Image

Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.