Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On September 4, the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit modified its March 18, 2020 opinion in Facebook v. Windy City Innovations, LLC, after Facebook's petition for rehearing. See, Facebook v. Windy City Innovations, LLC, No. 2018-1400, 2020 U.S. App. LEXIS 28187 (Fed. Cir. Mar. 18, 2020).
In June 2016, "exactly one year after being served with Windy City's complaint," Facebook petitioned for inter partes review (IPR) of several claims of each of the four asserted patents and the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) instituted the proceedings. Critically, when Facebook petitioned for the IPRs, Windy City had not yet identified which claims it was asserting against Facebook in district court. Id. at 2. Facebook later filed additional petitions for IPR of the claims Windy City subsequently identified in the district court litigation. Facebook filed motions for joinder of its newly filed IPRs to the already instituted IPRs.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.