Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Real Property Law

By ssalkin
October 01, 2020

Neighbors Who Used Concrete Platform Adjacent to Fence Established Title By Adverse Possession

Bursky v. Gerratano NYLJ 6/26/20, p. 26, col. 3 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)

In record owner's action for declaratory and injunctive relief and to recover damages for trespass, record owner appealed from Supreme Court's judgment, after a nonjury trial, holding that neighbors had acquired title to a disputed strip by adverse possession. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that under the applicable pre-2008 standards, neighbors had met all of the requirements for establishing adverse possession.

Record owner and neighbor have lived side-by-side on adjacent properties for 40 years. Their parcels are separated by a fence, and both parties believed the fence was on the boundary line. A 2010 survey revealed the 126 square feet of the property on the neighbors' side of the fence was actually part of record owner's parcel. The disputed strip is improved with a raised concrete platform cemented to the fence, part of neighbors' rear porch, and a staircase to that porch. Neighbors have made regular repairs to the fence and all of the encroachments; record owner had made none. On that record, Supreme Court concluded that neighbors had acquired title by adverse possession. Record owner appealed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.