Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

'Asserted Truths' Doctrine Used to Decide Jersey Boys Copyright Dispute

By Robert J. Bernstein and Robert W. Clarida
November 01, 2020

To prove copyright infringement, a plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant copied a substantial amount of protected expression from a plaintiff's work. Facts themselves are not copyrightable, although a sufficiently original selection, coordination or arrangement of facts may qualify for a compilation copyright. In its recent decision in Corbello v. Valli, 974 F.3d 966 (9th Cir. 2020), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit held that materials taken from an autobiography of Tommy DeVito — an original member of The Four Seasons music group — and used in the Broadway musical Jersey Boys depicting the band's history and hits, comprised facts and other noncopyrightable expression.

After filtering out the nonprotected expression, the Ninth Circuit found insufficient similarities of protected expression to constitute infringement. In its analysis, the appeals court rejected the plaintiff's argument that a number of copied incidents and events described in the book were "made up" by its authors and therefore should be treated as protected fiction. Instead, the court applied a doctrine sometimes referred to as "copyright estoppel" (but redefined by the court as the "asserted truths" doctrine) to require that facts represented in the autobiography to be historically accurate must be treated as nonprotected facts rather than protected fiction.

The DeVito autobiography was co-authored by DeVito and Rex Woodard, plaintiff Donna Corbello's deceased husband. It was completed in 1991, well before the development of the musical. The book purported to be a complete history of the band from the perspective of one of its original members, covering the entire period from its inception in the 1950s through its induction into the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame in 1990. Although DeVito initially obtained a copyright registration in his name as the sole author, Corbello later obtained a supplementary registration naming Woodard as co-author.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.