Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
DOJ's China Initiative Poses Growing Risks for Those with Chinese Ties
Over the past decade, scientists of Asian descent — mostly Chinese and Chinese American — have faced increasing government scrutiny into whether they are acting as agents for Chinese businesses and governmental entities. In 2018, the Department of Justice announced its China Initiative (the Initiative), a new policy dedicated to prosecuting economic espionage, trade secret theft, hacking, and other economic crimes done for the benefit of Chinese private and governmental entities. According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), "[a]bout 80 percent of all economic espionage prosecutions brought by [DOJ] allege conduct that would benefit the Chinese state, and there is at least some nexus to China in around 60 percent of all trade secret theft cases." Press Release, DOJ, Information About the Department of Justice's China Initiative and Compilation of China-Related Prosecutions Since 2018. The Initiative also increased DOJ's focus on "non-traditional collectors [of information]," defined as individuals who are not spies, but instead are professors, students, and other ordinary citizens coopted to gather and transfer valuable information and technologies contrary to the United States' interests. DOJ, Attorney General Jeff Session's China Initiative Fact Sheet.
In the two years since it's unveiling, the Initiative has expanded its scope from prosecutions of individuals suspected of stealing for China to those who simply have Chinese ties. The department is now increasing its mission to investigate individuals who are merely associated with Chinese recruitment programs like the Thousand Talents Plan (TTP), which the DOJ alleges is a program to "encourage the [illegal] transfer of original ideas and intellectual property from U.S. universities to Chinese government institutions." United States v. Tao, No. 2:19-cr-20052-JAR-1, Superseding Indictment at ¶ 2 (D. Kan. 2019).
In our global world where cross-jurisdiction collaboration in business and academia is common and encouraged, the DOJ's intense scrutiny and suspicion of China poses new risks for those who collaborate, even innocently, with Chinese entities. This article provides an overview of the Economic Espionage Act, DOJ's primary enforcement tool in this area, and other relevant laws and discusses recent prosecutions of non-traditional collectors in this emerging enforcement trend.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.