Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ruled in favor of internationally successful hip-hop duo Macklemore & Ryan Lewis in a music sampling suit brought against them by New Orleans jazz musician Paul Batiste. Batiste v. Lewis, 19-30400 (5th Cir. 2020). The decision is notable for the Fifth Circuit's use of the "widespread dissemination" and "chain of events" tests to determine whether the defendants had access to Batiste's works, neither which approach it said it had previously expressly adopted. In the opinion, the 5th Circuit also weighed in on the controversial Sixth Circuit opinion in Bridgeport Music Inc. v. Dimension Films, 383 F.3d 390 (6th Cir. 2004), which held that any sampling — even if digitally altered — from a pre-existing sound recording is automatic copyright infringement.
Batiste filed the copyright infringement complaint against Macklemore & Lewis over the alleged unauthorized sampling of 11 of Batiste's works in five of the defendants' recordings, including their debut hit "Thrift Shop," which sold over 10 million copies in the United States and has attracted more than 1.4 billion YouTube views. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana granted summary judgment for the defendants.
Affirming, the Fifth Circuit first denied Batiste's bid to "to allow him to resubmit [his proffered musicologist Archie] Milton's excluded expert report as his own." It turned out, the appeals court noted, "when pressed, Milton admitted that Batiste conducted the analysis in the report and that he couldn't verify the accuracy of Batiste's work because he didn't have access to the computer software that Batiste used to assess whether sampling occurred." The appeals court decided Batiste failed to show "good cause" under the scheduling orders factors of Rule 16(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, including because "allowing Batiste to submit the report after the discovery deadline would have prejudiced the defendants, who would need to redepose Batiste about his qualifications and methodology."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.