Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Center for Specialty Care, Inc. v. CSC Acquisitions I, LLC 2020 WL 4692864 AppDiv, First Dept. 8/13/20 (Opinion by Gische, J.)
In landlord's action for breach of a lease and other contracts, tenant appealed from Supreme Court's calculation of damages for breach of the lease. The Appellate Division modified, holding that tenant's liability terminated when landlord terminated the related contracts.
As part of an agreement for transfer of an ambulatory surgical center, landlord, an affiliate of the transferor of the surgical center, leased a townhouse to tenant, the transferee, for a 10-year term. The lease provided that if the other agreements should terminate for any reason, the lease would terminate simultaneously with those other agreements. The lease also authorized landlord to relet the premises for tenant's account. When tenant breached the various agreements, landlord relet the premises to transferor on Dec. 15, 2015. Then, on Jan. 6, 2016, landlord served tenant with a notice of termination. In this action, the transferor sought damages for breach of the transfer agreement, and landlord sought damages for breach of the lease. Supreme Court held that transferor was entitled to recover liquidated damages under the terms of the transfer agreement, and held that landlord was entitled to recover rent until the date landlord sold the building, Oct. 11, 2017. Tenant appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.