Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The COVID-19 pandemic is affecting the choice between ejectment actions and holdover proceedings in significant ways.
As rent defaults skyrocket in 2020, practitioners reviewing the default provisions in their clients' commercial leases must ask themselves a crucial question: Does the provision set out a conditional limitation or a condition subsequent? The answer to this arcane question — which can trip up even experienced attorneys — will determine the forum in which an owner can recover possession. The common assumption among many practitioners is that all landlord-tenant cases can be brought in the Civil Court. However, while this is true in connection with a lease termination based upon a conditional limitation, landlord-tenant courts — in which proceedings are governed by the Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law (RPAPL) — lack subject matter jurisdiction if the termination results from a condition subsequent.
The distinction between a conditional limitation and a condition subsequent was perhaps best explained by the court in Lamlon Dev. Corp. v. Owens:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?