Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In In re Smith, (B.A.P. 10th Cir., Aug. 18, 2020), the U.S. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit recently joined the majority of circuit courts of appeals in finding that a creditor seeking a judgment of nondischargeability must demonstrate that the injury caused by the prepetition debtor was both willful and malicious under Section 523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code.
Michael Smith, an attorney, worked for 22 years for Equity Title Insurance Company (Equity Title) and served as Equity Title's chief operating officer and general counsel. In 2008, First American Title Co. and an affiliate (First American), a competitor of Equity Title, acquired a majority interest in Equity Title and changed Smith's title to "State Underwriting and Legal Counsel." In 2012, First American and Equity Title officially completed their merger.
Before the merger, in 2004, Smith had entered into an employment agreement with Equity Title that contained a non-compete clause and a non-solicitation clause. After the merger, Smith did not sign a new employment agreement with First American. First American, however, regularly required its employees to review and acknowledge the First American Employee Handbook and Code of Ethics and Conduct online; employees would receive a prompt to access the Employee Handbook and Code of Ethics, and a further prompt to clink an "I Acknowledge" button, which would confirm that they had read and agreed to the terms thereof. Smith did not deny making such an acknowledgment.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.