Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recent news regarding complaints of sexual harassment by several former female employees of the now-called Washington Football Team (formerly known as the Washington Redskins) has reignited the conversation on workplace misconduct and the use of nondisclosure agreements. This incident has renewed discussions on the impact of nondisclosure agreements in the settlement of workplace discrimination and harassment claims, which have increased in the entertainment industry in recent years.
Employers include nondisclosure provisions in a variety of employment documents often linked to the commencement or termination of an employee's employment. For example, nondisclosure agreements can commonly be found in employment agreements where the employee agrees not to disclose a company's confidential or proprietary information. These agreements are extremely valuable to employers, such as those in the highly competitive entertainment industry, who entrust their trade secrets to employees and wish to keep such information secret to remain competitive.
In other instances, these provisions are contained in settlement agreements, where they are designed to restrict the parties from discussing settlement negotiations, the settlement amount or the underlying claims. Relatedly, settlement agreements will often include non-disparagement provisions, which prohibit either party from making statements that would injure the reputation of the other party, even if those statements are not otherwise defamatory. Importantly, nondisclosure agreements, even in the settlement context, do not require that the existence of the agreement itself be kept confidential.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.