Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Finding Common Ground In Lease Provisions During COVID-19

By Fredric P. Lavinthal and Eric M. Finkelstein
December 01, 2020

The coronavirus has fundamentally altered our lifestyles, working conditions and our consumer-driven economy. It has devastated certain retailers, crippled others and, as a consequence, caused landlords and tenants to re-think (and, in many cases to renegotiate) their short-term and long-term contractual relationships. This article seeks to examine key current issues, and offers practical advice to landlords and tenants seeking common ground to address the ongoing financial toll of the pandemic, and suggests approaches that should be considered when drafting and negotiating lease provisions such as force majeure, early termination rights and co-tenancy obligations.

The Pandemic's Effects

Landlords and tenants are breaking established conventions to try to assure their survival. These efforts focus on the common theme of full or partial abatement of rent payments during periods of mandated closure or to afford relief due to diminished sales performance or a tenant's inability to fully utilize a leased premises. As numerous tenants in retail and office centers seek or require fiscal relief, landlords should be mindful of their loan covenants if the property is financed. Rent deferments, abatements or long term rent restructuring may trigger lender consent requirements or may simply be forbidden under applicable loan documents. Similarly, a careful analysis of loan covenants such as debt service coverage ratios and loan to value requirements should be undertaken to determine whether property that is financed remains in compliance with financing constraints and whether leases will, once modified, qualify if and when refinancing becomes necessary.

Before a landlord and tenant determine that their best interests may be served by reforming lease economics, consideration should be given to whether its better and safer to enter into binding commitments now instead of judging and reacting to facts and circumstances as they occur to allow for their effects to be judged. If the decision is to proceed, the following elements should be considered:

  1. Fairly and realistically adjusting and resetting any early termination rights and co-tenancy protections contained in retail leases;
  2. Deciding whether full or partial rent abatement is to be given or whether rent should be deferred and recouped over time;
  3. Establishing a new base rent and coupling that with additional rent based on a percentage of sales;
  4. Using security deposits to cover rent deficiencies and, if so, their replenishment;
  5. Conditioning rent relief on application for and payment of funds received from government assistance programs and/or insurance proceeds; and
  6. Expanding or contracting the term of the lease.

Clarity and flexibility must be maintained. Landlords should take care to restructure leases to only address the established impacts of the pandemic. Tenants continuing to struggle with the economic slowdown wrought by the pandemic should engage landlords to revisit and recalibrate previously negotiated relief which is now deemed insufficient.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.