Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The COVID-19 pandemic pushed brands headlong into e-commerce. Certain advertising and marketing practices led to litigation in 2020. Brands and their legal counsel should target these hot topics for legal vetting and risk mitigation as we move forward into 2021.
With the slowdown of mail systems, consumers grew frustrated with unfulfilled promises from companies. The FTC took notice and starting enforcing its Mail, Internet, or Telephone Order Merchandise Rule (Mail Order Rule) (https://bit.ly/38JQDj7). This detailed FTC rule outlines requirements for the timing of shipping and related customer communications. At its most bare bones, the rule dictates a 30-day presumed delivery window for goods ordered via mail, Internet, or telephone. Sellers may deviate from the 30-day window if they have a reasonable basis for another time frame and make meaningful disclosures before the sale. Once the sale happens, the seller may change the delivery window by a notice to the consumers that includes refund procedures.
In April 2020, the agency announced a $9.3 million settlement ("record-setting" according to the agency) with Fashion Nova regarding its unmet promises of fast and quick shipping. Then, in November 2020, the FTC obtained a temporary restraining order in Ohio federal court against 25 websites that allegedly "trick [consumers] into paying for genuine Clorox and Lysol products that the defendants never deliver." (See, FTC v One or more unknown parties, et. al. N.D. Ohio, 5:20-cv-02494.) The defendants, they allege, are part of an elaborate scheme that utilizes fake websites, falsifies shipment information, infringes trademarks, employs deceptive URLs, and deceives consumers. The complaint outlines violations of the FTC Act and the Mail Order Rule.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.