Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the rapidly changing environment surrounding the legal issue of embedding (a type of inline linking that displays images and videos hosted somewhere other than the current publisher's servers), the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York has added another ruling that places the liability associated with such behavior in uncertain waters. On Nov. 2, 2020, the court dismissed plaintiff Michael Barret Boesen's Complaint against United Sports Publications, Ltd. (USP) on the grounds that it failed to allege a claim for which relief could be granted under Rule 12(b)(6). Boesen v. United Sports Publs., Ltd., No. 20-CV-1552 (ARR) (SIL), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 203682 (E.D.N.Y. Nov. 2, 2020)
Embedding social media has been a commonplace practice for years. Indeed, it is still commonplace to see Instagram and twitter posts embedded throughout other publishers' content. Such a practice seemed safe under the Ninth Circuit's "server test" adopted in Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc, 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007). However, in recent years, the notion that embedders may be liable as copyright infringers has resurfaced as courts outside of the Ninth Circuit address the issue. See, e.g., Goldman v. Breitbart News Network LLC, 302 F. Supp. 3d 585, 590 (S.D.N.Y. 2018); Leader's Inst., LLC v. Jackson, No. 3:14-CV-3572-B, 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19355, 29-30 (N.D. Tex. Nov. 22, 2017); McGucken v. Newsweek LLC, No. 19 Civ. 9617 (KPF), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 96126 (S.D.N.Y. Jun. 1, 2020).
On Dec. 6, 2019, world-renowned tennis player Caroline Wozniacki announced her retirement from the sport on her Instagram page. The post included a low-resolution version of a photograph taken by Boesen in 2002 depicting a young Wozniacki about to serve. That same day, USP ran an article embedding Wozniacki's original Instagram post featuring a cropped version of Boesen's photograph. USP embedded the post without a license or permission from Boesen. After Boesen filed an amended complaint for copyright infringement, USP moved to dismiss under Rule 12(b)(6). Discussing the merits of Boesen's complaint, the court analyzed whether or not USP's article constituted fair use.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.