Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Despite COVID-19 pandemic disruptions, entities with shareholders must timely execute both director and shareholder meetings. The legal duty to conduct meetings has not been altered by prohibitions on gatherings. Holding director meetings and shareholder meetings via the Internet may attenuate meeting difficulties while mitigating health concerns, however, doing so raises the issue of cybersecurity.
Complying with federal securities laws, applicable state laws and traditional corporate governance practices normally results in in-person directors meetings and shareholders meetings. Such meetings have been discouraged by pandemic regulations. Suitable use of existing technologies, and amendments in entity procedures and governance documents, allow internet communications to be lawfully integrated into director meetings and shareholder meetings to overcome COVID-19 related difficulty including "social distancing" requirements and bans on large gatherings. The use of said internet communication means that cybersecurity has become an urgent concern for companies.
Shareholder meetings predominantly choose directors at their meetings. Director meetings primarily address running the firm. Shareholder meetings and director meetings each have separate meeting requirements. The internet may be used to facilitate both director and shareholder meetings exclusively held through electronic means, and without any in-person component. However, recent data breach difficulties have demonstrated that officers and directors must take commercially reasonable cybersecurity precautions, or they may be exposed to individual liability.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.