Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
SCOTUS Set to Address Circuit Split in Interpreting CFAA
The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) is the sort of broadly worded criminal statute which gives white-collar prosecutors considerable power — and makes defense counsel and judges uneasy. The law prohibits obtaining information by "access[ing] a computer without authorization or exceed[ing] authorized access." Computer hacking — "access[ing] a computer without authorization" — clearly violates the law. But the meaning of the other operative words, "or exceed[ing] authorized access," is not so clear.
The different ways of interpreting the statute have led to a split in the Courts of Appeals. Four circuits have read the statute broadly: An individual "exceeds authorized access" when she accesses a computer and obtains information for an improper purpose, even if the person's access to the information is authorized. Four other circuits have read the statute narrowly: An individual "exceeds authorized access" only if she obtains information that she is not allowed to access, even if the purpose is improper. In practical terms, if a company Human Resources officer peeks at sensitive information out of idle curiosity, not because of work, would that be a crime because of the improper purpose, or would it not be a crime because the HR officer had the authority to review personnel files?
The meaning of "exceeds authorized access" will soon be taken up by the Supreme Court in United States v. Van Buren, 940 F.3d 1192 (11th Cir. 2019), cert. granted, 2020 WL 190655 (Mem.) (U.S. April 20, 2020). Oral argument was scheduled for Nov. 30, 2020. This article describes the circuit split and explore different methods used by appellate courts to interpret the operative words of the CFAA. In Van Buren, the Supreme Court will have the opportunity once more to articulate its approach to interpreting white-collar criminal statutes.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.