Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Fort Lauderdale copyright attorneys Matthew Nelles and Adriana Kostencki of Nelles Kostencki were in a Los Angeles airport in February 2019, when movie director, producer and actor Spike Lee called the day after winning an Oscar for his historical crime drama BlacKkKlansman. But the call wasn't about the win.
Nelles recalled how Lee — real name Shelton Jackson Lee — had just heard about a New York copyright infringement lawsuit filed against him by someone who had sued him years before in Florida. "Spike Lee's saying, 'How could this happen?' And I'm thinking, 'I don't know how this could possibly happen,'" Nelles recalled. "Because, immediately, what comes into my head are two principles of law called res judicata and collateral estoppel," two principles aimed at preventing the same parties from relitigating an issue after it's been resolved.
Nelles and Kostencki had successfully defended a 2015 lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida from plaintiff James Brandon, who accused Lee, Lee's production company 40 Acres and a Mule Musicworks Inc., 20th Century Fox Film Corp. and the musician Prince — officially Prince Rogers Nelson — and others of copyright infringement.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?