Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The copyright dispute over a Dr. Seuss/Star Trek mashup divided industries and intellectual property scholars, but it didn't trouble the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit at all. Instead, the court resoundingly rejected the fair use defense of the writers and publisher who placed Star Trek characters in the setting of Dr. Seuss's best-selling book Oh, the Places You'll Go! and called it Oh, the Places You'll Boldly Go!
Ninth Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown acknowledged in Dr. Seuss Enterprises L.P. v. ComicMix LLC, 983 F.3d 443 (2020) that "fair use analysis can be elusive to the point of 'approaching the metaphysics of the law.'" But, she wrote, "Not so in this case."
The court's decision means that in the Ninth Circuit commercial mash-ups will have to do more than place new characters in old settings to qualify for fair use. That's sure to please the Motion Picture Association of America, which had warned that a finding of fair use would open the door for third parties to infringe on soundtracks, toys, games, clothing and other markets that derive from classic movies and TV shows. The Electronic Frontier Foundation, on the other hand, had cautioned that "millions of Americans communicate through the art of mash-up, putting multiple works in conversation with one another to create new expression."
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.