Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed a lower court ruling that the defendants' use of supermodel Janice Dickinson's personal appearance in the reality TV series Shahs of Sunset, to promote the show, didn't violate Dickinson's rights under the federal Lanham Act. Dickinson v. Ryan Seacrest Enterprises Inc., 19-55415. Dickinson, who claimed she hadn't signed a participant release, alleged: "Defendants have and continue to falsely represent that the Series is a documentary program rather than a scripted or fictional series, when in fact the Series is largely or entirely scripted. The group did so to market, advertise, and promote the Series by improperly trading off the goodwill, celebrity, and fame of Plaintiff, without paying any fee." Dickinson charged the defendants "agreed and conspired to script an episode of the Series … to include a false controversy in which they would make it appear that Plaintiff intentionally stole or bullied her way into wearing an outfit that had supposedly been previously selected for Golnesa Gharachedaghi (Gharachedaghi), a lead character on the Series." The U.S. District Court for the District of California found "the use of Plaintiff's name and likeness are artistically relevant to the Episode." In its affirmance, the Ninth Circuit noted in part: "Dickinson did not allege that the Shahs episode or the promotional materials for that episode contained an explicit representation that Dickinson was an endorser or sponsor of the series. Rather, Dickinson alleged only that she made an appearance on the show. … Thus, Dickinson failed to allege that Appellees' use of the mark is explicitly misleading as to source or sponsorship.
*****
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
This article explores legal developments over the past year that may impact compliance officer personal liability.