Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Landlord & Tenant Law

By Stewart Sterk
February 01, 2021

Guaranty Did Not Extend Past Lease Term

PRG Associates LP v. Planet Organic Holding Corp. NYLJ 11/6/20, p.29, col. 4 AppDiv, Second Dept. (memorandum opinion)

In landlord's action on a personal guaranty of a commercial lease, landlord appealed from Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to the guarantor. The Appellate Division affirmed, holding that the guaranty did not extend beyond tenant's lease term.

When landlord negotiated a lease extension with tenant in 2004, guarantor executed a guaranty which, by its terms, made guarantor liable "until the date that there shall have been delivered to Owner a vacate instrument confirming the Premises are vacant, broom clean, free of occupants, and free of Tenant." When the lease extension expired, tenant did not vacate. Landlord brought an action against tenant for breach, which was settled by a stipulation under the terms of which tenant agreed to entry of judgment for $413,800.87 with the understanding that landlord would not execute the judgment if tenant complied with the terms of the new, seven year, lease executed in 2016. Tenant vacated the premises in June 2018 and stopped paying rent. Landlord brought an action against tenant and guarantor to recover rent arrears and to enforce the guaranty. Supreme Court concluded that there were issues of fact about whether guarantor was liable for amounts owed under the 2004 lease extension, but granted guarantor summary judgment dismissing so much of the claim as sought to recover damages for breach of the 2016 lease. Landlord appealed.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.