Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The 2020 pandemic and resulting economic upheaval has left many sectors of the economy — and employees and others who depend on them — in distress. Others have navigated the current environment better than expected. For example, for operators of hospitality businesses, it has been one reality; for video-conference companies, it has presented an opportunity. Perhaps no sector has been more challenged than the restaurant industry. And, as is often the case, these difficult situations and the resulting tough choices must be addressed in the bankruptcy system.
While most media attention has been reserved for large economic retailers like Neiman Marcus and J.C. Penney, and large restaurant chains, today we report on a small restaurant chain and the choices that it had made.
In In re The Krystal Co., Case No. 20-61065-pwb, Bankruptcy Judge Paul W. Bonapfel of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia addressed objections by individual employees and trade creditors to dismissal of a Chapter 11 case after the debtor's assets were sold with court approval in an effort to keep the business operating, albeit on a smaller platform. The objectors would not receive any recovery on their claims regardless of what happened in the case. Bonapfel's opinion explains, in layman terms, how the system produced this outcome.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.