Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
COVID-19 brought new realties to almost every aspect of life including the physical production of print/mail noticing and the timely delivery of mail by the U.S. Postal Service (USPS). The fallout from heavy mail in ballots during the 2020 elections as well as record increases in online shopping and shipping caused systemic delivery delays throughout the USPS. Return of undeliverable mail was reported to take up to two months to be returned during peak periods.
Such realities made me delight in the concept of service being complete via the notice of electronic filing (NEF) generated by the court's Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) system. However, under FRBP 2002, several notices are required to be served on all creditors. The reality is, the majority of parties who fall under the category of "all creditors" are NOT registered users of CM/ECF. And it is typical in small and middle market cases that the out of pocket costs associated with printing and mailing are daunting, while in bigger cases they are sometimes beyond extraordinary.
What to do?
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?