Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
More than ever before, legal and regulatory activities require high-quality data and increasingly sophisticated techniques for seeking out, preserving, and collecting that data for litigation. In particular, e-discovery activities can often create snags for counsel through myriad ways — from custodian collection mistakes to actions that lead to permanent injunctions due to ESI spoliation. In this winter e-discovery case law review, we'll cover three cases that might have turned out differently had counsel supervised e-discovery activities more adequately.
E.E.O.C. v. M1 5100 Corp., No. 19-cv-81320 (S.D. Fla. July 2, 2020)
Why This Case Is Important
In today's sophisticated digital environment, people can feel so confident in their IT skills that they think can do anything an e-discovery professional or IT professional can do. This case is a prime example that this isn't true, and for an e-discovery process to be truly defensible, legal teams must play an important role in ensuring the proper and comprehensive collection/processing of data in e-discovery.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.