Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In response to a copyright claim in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California that the Netflix series Stranger Things infringed on Irish Rover Entertainment's unpublished screenplays, Netflix and the other defendants filed a Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss under the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, arguing that the works were not substantially similar as a matter of law. In connection with the motion, Netflix submitted — and the district court accepted — copies of the allegedly infringed screenplays and the allegedly infringing three seasons of Stranger Things.
Netflix provided a detailed analysis to demonstrate that the competing works were not "substantially similar" under the "extrinsic similarity" test, which applies at the Rule 12(b)(6) pleading stage. Under this test, a court conducts an objective analysis of similarities between the competing works' plot, themes, dialogue, settings, pacing, characters and sequence of events after filtering out non-protectable similarities (e.g., scenes à faire elements, historical facts and general ideas).
In contrast to Irish Rover Entertainment's screenplays — which Netflix described as telling the story of an epileptic army veteran's quest to free his dead wife's spirit from a giant English-speaking angel/demon — Netflix explained that Stranger Things focuses on a group of teenagers dealing with common teenage issues (e.g., conflicts with adults, romantic crushes), while engaging with and fighting off science fiction monsters, evil scientists and Russian military personnel.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.