Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Vincent Cox of Ballard Spahr in Los Angeles and Scott Ponce of Holland & Knight in Miami prevailed recently in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, defending several powerful entities in a copyright infringement action. Cox and Ponce defended six clients, including horror novelist Stephen King, New York-based publisher Simon & Schuster and Marvel Entertainment LLC.
The lawyers said one of the main hurdles in the case was taking the time to compare characters portrayed in works of fiction. "Sometimes copyright cases involve works such as photographs or songs that can be quickly experienced and compared. That was not this case," Cox stated in an email. "Much time had elapsed between the underlying creative events and the filing of the suit. There was also an exceptional volume of literary and visual material alleged to infringe, and to be infringed." DuBay v. King, 19-11224.
The dispute centered on a fictional character that King created in the 1970s named Roland Deschain and the plaintiff's character, Restin Dane, created by a three-person team around the same time. Plaintiff Benjamin DuBay owns the copyright for a comic book series called The Rook, which featured Dane, and sold more than five million copies in a six-year period. DuBay sued King for copyright infringement in The Dark Tower novel series involving the use of protagonist Deschain.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.