Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

11th Circuit Rules for Stephen King In Suit Over Dark Tower Series

By Michael A. Mora
April 01, 2021

Vincent Cox of Ballard Spahr in Los Angeles and Scott Ponce of Holland & Knight in Miami prevailed recently in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, defending several powerful entities in a copyright infringement action. Cox and Ponce defended six clients, including horror novelist Stephen King, New York-based publisher Simon & Schuster and Marvel Entertainment LLC.

The lawyers said one of the main hurdles in the case was taking the time to compare characters portrayed in works of fiction. "Sometimes copyright cases involve works such as photographs or songs that can be quickly experienced and compared. That was not this case," Cox stated in an email. "Much time had elapsed between the underlying creative events and the filing of the suit. There was also an exceptional volume of literary and visual material alleged to infringe, and to be infringed." DuBay v. King, 19-11224.

The dispute centered on a fictional character that King created in the 1970s named Roland Deschain and the plaintiff's character, Restin Dane, created by a three-person team around the same time. Plaintiff Benjamin DuBay owns the copyright for a comic book series called The Rook, which featured Dane, and sold more than five million copies in a six-year period. DuBay sued King for copyright infringement in The Dark Tower novel series involving the use of protagonist Deschain.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.