Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Congress Leaves SEC Subject to Litigation Over Disgorgement
On Jan. 1, 2021, the U.S. Congress rang in the new year by passing the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. Buried in the massive spending bill is §6501, a provision authorizing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to seek disgorgement of unjust enrichment within 10 years for certain securities law violations, and five years for others. Congress passed this legislation in apparent response to a pair of U.S. Supreme Court decisions that limited disgorgement in SEC enforcement actions to a five-year statute of limitations and required that the remedy not exceed a wrongdoer's net profits and be awarded for the benefit of victims. See, Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017); Liu v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 140 S. Ct. 1936, 1940 (2020).
While Congress may have intended for §6501 to free the SEC from the limits imposed by these two High Court decisions, a close reading of the statute's text reveals that the legislation fell short of its mark. As such, the new law leaves defendants in enforcement actions free to argue that Congress has not actually restored any of the agency's lost powers, subjecting the SEC to continued litigation over disgorgement absent an additional legislative fix.
|Summary of Recent Precedent
In 2017, the Supreme Court decided whether disgorgement in SEC enforcement actions constituted a "civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture" subject to a five-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. §2462, which governs the authority of federal courts to issue such relief in all actions, including those brought by the SEC. Kokesh, 137 S. Ct. 1635. A unanimous court held that the five-year statute of limitations applied, since the remedy in these cases bore all the hallmarks of a penalty: It is imposed as a consequence for violations of public laws committed against the United States rather than an aggrieved individual, and is intended to deter, not to compensate.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Power of Your Inner Circle: Turning Friends and Social Contacts Into Business Allies
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.