Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Jan. 1, 2021, the U.S. Congress rang in the new year by passing the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. Buried in the massive spending bill is §6501, a provision authorizing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to seek disgorgement of unjust enrichment within 10 years for certain securities law violations, and five years for others. Congress passed this legislation in apparent response to a pair of U.S. Supreme Court decisions that limited disgorgement in SEC enforcement actions to a five-year statute of limitations and required that the remedy not exceed a wrongdoer's net profits and be awarded for the benefit of victims. See, Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017); Liu v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 140 S. Ct. 1936, 1940 (2020).
While Congress may have intended for §6501 to free the SEC from the limits imposed by these two High Court decisions, a close reading of the statute's text reveals that the legislation fell short of its mark. As such, the new law leaves defendants in enforcement actions free to argue that Congress has not actually restored any of the agency's lost powers, subjecting the SEC to continued litigation over disgorgement absent an additional legislative fix.
In 2017, the Supreme Court decided whether disgorgement in SEC enforcement actions constituted a "civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture" subject to a five-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. §2462, which governs the authority of federal courts to issue such relief in all actions, including those brought by the SEC. Kokesh, 137 S. Ct. 1635. A unanimous court held that the five-year statute of limitations applied, since the remedy in these cases bore all the hallmarks of a penalty: It is imposed as a consequence for violations of public laws committed against the United States rather than an aggrieved individual, and is intended to deter, not to compensate.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.