Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On Jan. 1, 2021, the U.S. Congress rang in the new year by passing the William M. (Mac) Thornberry National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021. Buried in the massive spending bill is §6501, a provision authorizing the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to seek disgorgement of unjust enrichment within 10 years for certain securities law violations, and five years for others. Congress passed this legislation in apparent response to a pair of U.S. Supreme Court decisions that limited disgorgement in SEC enforcement actions to a five-year statute of limitations and required that the remedy not exceed a wrongdoer's net profits and be awarded for the benefit of victims. See, Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 137 S. Ct. 1635 (2017); Liu v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'n, 140 S. Ct. 1936, 1940 (2020).
While Congress may have intended for §6501 to free the SEC from the limits imposed by these two High Court decisions, a close reading of the statute's text reveals that the legislation fell short of its mark. As such, the new law leaves defendants in enforcement actions free to argue that Congress has not actually restored any of the agency's lost powers, subjecting the SEC to continued litigation over disgorgement absent an additional legislative fix.
|In 2017, the Supreme Court decided whether disgorgement in SEC enforcement actions constituted a "civil fine, penalty, or forfeiture" subject to a five-year statute of limitations under 28 U.S.C. §2462, which governs the authority of federal courts to issue such relief in all actions, including those brought by the SEC. Kokesh, 137 S. Ct. 1635. A unanimous court held that the five-year statute of limitations applied, since the remedy in these cases bore all the hallmarks of a penalty: It is imposed as a consequence for violations of public laws committed against the United States rather than an aggrieved individual, and is intended to deter, not to compensate.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.