Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Delaware judge ruled not to grant a motion that would have stayed a liquidation plan setting aside $17 million to settle with those who have claimed sexual misconduct by former film industry executive Harvey Weinstein. David v. The Weinstein Co. Holdings LLC, 21-171.
With the motion denied, it's likely the Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation for The Weinstein Co. Holdings as laid out in bankruptcy court will now move forward, as the four appellants — who have sexual misconduct claims against Harvey Weinstein — were the only parties to object to the plan. Federal Judge Maryellen Noreika wrote the releases that spurred the appeal give a chance for those who have made sexual misconduct claims against Harvey Weinstein, including the four appellants, to get meaningful payment, as opposed to likely getting nothing in a Chapter 7 liquidation.
The liquidation plan includes a global settlement, which would release nonconsensual third-party insurers and former officers and directors in exchange for insurers providing $35.2 million, nearly half of which would be set aside in a trust to pay those with sexual misconduct claims. In exchange for their release, the proposed plan requires insurers, officers and directors to waive potential indemnity claims or reimbursement for defense costs. On Dec. 18, the appellants objected to the plan, arguing it didn't meet Third Circuit standards because releasing those parties wasn't necessary for a reorganization and that the bankruptcy court made errors in its factual findings.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.