Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
A U.S. District Court Judge for the District of Delaware judge ruled not to grant a motion that would have stayed a liquidation plan setting aside $17 million to settle with those who have claimed sexual misconduct by former film industry executive Harvey Weinstein. David v. The Weinstein Co. Holdings LLC, 21-171.
With the motion denied, it's likely the Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Liquidation for The Weinstein Co. Holdings as laid out in bankruptcy court will now move forward, as the four appellants — who have sexual misconduct claims against Harvey Weinstein — were the only parties to object to the plan. Federal Judge Maryellen Noreika wrote the releases that spurred the appeal give a chance for those who have made sexual misconduct claims against Harvey Weinstein, including the four appellants, to get meaningful payment, as opposed to likely getting nothing in a Chapter 7 liquidation.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.