Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
U.S. Bank N.A. v. Nelson NYLJ 12/18/20, p. 26, col. 3 Court of Appeals (memorandum opinion; concurring opinion by Wilson, J.)
In a bank's foreclosure action, mortgagors appealed from the Appellate Division's affirmance of Supreme Court's grant of summary judgment to mortgagee bank. The Court of Appeals affirmed, holding that mortgagors had waived their claims that mortgagee lacked standing by failing to raise standing in their answers or pre-answer motions.
The bank brought this foreclosure action, tendering evidence that it was the holder of the note. Supreme Court awarded summary judgment to the bank. Mortgagors appealed, asserting that the bank lacked standing because it was not the owner of the note. The Appellate Division rejected the argument, and the mortgagors appealed.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.