Employers Must Be Mindful of Pay Practices, As Criminal Charges for Underpayment of Workers Becomes Increasingly Common

Clinton's statement was a nod to a movement, then in its early stages, to treat employers' failures to appropriately compensate workers as criminal rather than civil or regulatory failures. Where prevailing wage violations were previously handled primarily via audits by the Department of Labor or their state equivalent, and usually resulted in employers being required to pay back wages, this movement saw such violations as equivalent to traditional theft, and favored using the tools of criminal justice to address them. This movement has grown, and has recently gained momentum. Today, prosecutors across the country increasingly seek criminal fines and jail time for what were previously seen as non-criminal labor violations. For more information about corporate criminal liability, see, Carolyn Kendall, "Corporate Criminal Liability in the COVID-19 Era," Business Crimes Bulletin (June 2020).

A Breakthrough In California

When Clinton called for jailing employers for "wage theft," that term was just gaining wide usage. Then-California Labor Commissioner Julie Su had recently launched a "Wage Theft Is a Crime" public awareness campaign and the hashtag #wagetheftisacrime had recently appeared on Twitter for the first time. See, Stephenie Overman, "Waging War on Wage Theft," Salon (Mar. 30, 2019). Commissioner Su's campaign sought to raise awareness that California's workers had legal recourse if they were not paid fairly; importantly, the campaign also emphasized that "the Labor Commissioner's Office can partner with other law enforcement agencies to criminally prosecute employers that engage in wage theft." California Labor Commissioner's Office (wagetheftisacrime.com).