Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
On March 9, 2021, a Federal Circuit panel of Judges Newman, Moore, and Hughes issued a unanimous opinion, authored by Judge Moore, in Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC v. Munchkin, Inc., Case No. 2020-1203. The panel vacated the Central District of California's grant of summary judgment of noninfringement on one patent, reversed the judgment of noninfringement of a second patent, and remanded for further proceedings. Slip Op. at 13.
Edgewell Personal Care Brands, LLC and International Refills Company, Ltd. (Edgewell) sued Munchkin, Inc. (Munchkin) for infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 8,899,420 (the '420 Patent) and 6,974,029 (the '029 Patent). Both the '420 and '029 patents are directed to improved cassette designs for Edgewell's Diaper Genie product, "which is a diaper pail system that has … (i) a pail for collection of soiled diapers; and (ii) a replaceable cassette that is placed inside the pail and forms a wrapper around the soiled diapers." Id. at 2. The accused products, "Munchkin's Second and Third Generation refill cassettes" were "marketed as being compatible with Edgewell's Diaper Genie" products. Id.
The '420 Patent claims a cassette with a "clearance" that "prevents users from installing [it] upside down." Id. at 3. At summary judgment, the parties' "dispute focused on whether the claims required a clearance space … when the cassette was installed." Id. at 4. The district court concluded that clearance "required space after cassette installation" and "[b]ased on that construction … granted Munchkin summary judgment of noninfringement." Id.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.