Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Telehealth: The Wave of the Future for Both Medicine and Enforcement

By Jacqueline C. Wolff and Michael Herrmann
May 01, 2021

Before COVID-19 hit our shores, digital health was starting to take hold as the wave of the future for the practice of medicine. An AMA study from 2019 noted that at least 87% of physicians saw an advantage to using these digital tools. "Use of … digital health tools … has increased and the average number of those tools used per physician has also increased. The largest increases were in tele-visits (usage doubled from 14% in 2016 to 28% in 2019) and remote monitoring for improved care."

Since the declaration by the then Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) of the Public Health Emergency [PHE] on Jan. 31, 2020, telehealth has increased exponentially in large measure due to Congress and CMS's expansion of coverage for telehealth services in the Medicare and Medicaid populations. (See, Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy, Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, March 2021, pg. 457.)

In July 2020, a report highlighted the significant increase in telehealth among Medicare beneficiaries, noting that nearly half (43.5%) of Medicare's primary care visits were being provided via telehealth, compared to the 0.1% rate seen in the month prior to the PHE. (See, Medicare Beneficiary Use of Telehealth Visits: Early Data From the Start of the COVID-19 Pandemic, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, July 28, 2020.) Similarly, in October 2020 the CDC reported that telehealth visits were up 154% in the last week of March 2020 compared with the same period the previous year. Further, the HHS report noted that, although in-person visits increased a bit into May, the use of telehealth "leveled off at a persistent and significant level by the beginning of" June 2020. (See, Medicare Beneficiary Use of Telehealth Visits, supra.)

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Role and Responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders Image

Ideally, the objective of defining the role and responsibilities of Practice Group Leaders should be to establish just enough structure and accountability within their respective practice group to maximize the economic potential of the firm, while institutionalizing the principles of leadership and teamwork.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?