Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Congress created Subchapter V of Chapter 11 (Sub V) of the Bankruptcy Code to help small business debtors (companies and individuals) complete traditional reorganizations in Chapter 11. It is no secret that Chapter 11, over the years, evolved to be an expensive and uncertain remedy for those seeking its relief, especially smaller debtors. Moreover, the sale of substantially all of a debtor's assets outside the context of a Chapter 11 plan went from being the exception, in the early 1980s, to the rule today.
This explains, in part, the rise of Chapter 11 alternatives like assignments for the benefit of creditors and friendly UCC foreclosures followed by a sale of the assets of the company by the foreclosing lender back to the owners of the defaulting company (or a newco comprised by parties including them). See, Jonathan Friedland, Rise of the Alternatives for more information.
By design, Sub V of Chapter 11 was intended to be far less expensive than traditional Chapter 11, to be faster, and to enable debtors to confirm plans that would be unconfirmable in a traditional Chapter 11.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?