Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Uniloc 2017 LLC v. Apple, Inc.
In a near total victory for Apple, the Federal Circuit affirmed a decision by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) rendering invalid certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,539,552 (the '552 Patent) owned by Uniloc 2017 LLC (Uniloc), because of obviousness. Specifically, the court found claims 1-17 and 23-25 obvious, while claims 18-22 remained patentable.
The '552 Patent is directed to a system and method to police features associated with telecom systems using Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP), such as caller-ID, call waiting, multi-line services, and codec specification. The patent recognizes that the proliferation of intelligent client devices in communication networks requires providers to maintain control over the use of their networks' features in order to continue generating revenue. To achieve that control, the patented system employs an enforcement mechanism within the provider's core network through which clients send "signaling messages" for setting up their communication sessions. Because the enforcement point sits between the sender of the communication and the intended recipient, the provider can inspect the signaling messages and ensure that both ends of the communication are authorized to use particular features.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Businesses have long embraced the use of computer technology in the workplace as a means of improving efficiency and productivity of their operations. In recent years, businesses have incorporated artificial intelligence and other automated and algorithmic technologies into their computer systems. This article provides an overview of the federal regulatory guidance and the state and local rules in place so far and suggests ways in which employers may wish to address these developments with policies and practices to reduce legal risk.
This two-part article dives into the massive shifts AI is bringing to Google Search and SEO and why traditional searches are no longer part of the solution for marketers. It’s not theoretical, it’s happening, and firms that adapt will come out ahead.
For decades, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act has been the only law to expressly address privacy for minors’ information other than student data. In the absence of more robust federal requirements, states are stepping in to regulate not only the processing of all minors’ data, but also online platforms used by teens and children.
In an era where the workplace is constantly evolving, law firms face unique challenges and opportunities in facilities management, real estate, and design. Across the industry, firms are reevaluating their office spaces to adapt to hybrid work models, prioritize collaboration, and enhance employee experience. Trends such as flexible seating, technology-driven planning, and the creation of multifunctional spaces are shaping the future of law firm offices.
Protection against unauthorized model distillation is an emerging issue within the longstanding theme of safeguarding intellectual property. This article examines the legal protections available under the current legal framework and explore why patents may serve as a crucial safeguard against unauthorized distillation.