Issues Relating to RLUIPA Safe Harbor and the Equal Protection Clause

The Plaintiffs are an organization and individuals of the Orthodox Jewish Faith, who have strict rules regarding the worship services they must attend and not riding in automobiles on the Sabbath. These various religious mandates require a central location for meals between services and a location within reasonable walking distance to the homes of the congregants, particularly as certain services are after dark and the Village of Chestnut Ridge has few areas with sidewalks. As of January 2019 the Village local laws (the Old Law) required that a house of worship be on no less than a five acre parcel. The only such parcel available in the Village was not centrally located and was prohibitively expensive for the small congregation. Therefore, the congregation rented temporary facilities it claimed were inadequate and caused the loss of congregants, due in part to the temporary nature of the facility. Further, there were claims related to various attempts by the Village to seek fines for alleged violations of the Old Law.

The Old Law did not permit religious uses in non-residential areas and required the issuance of a Special Permit from the Village Board, with no specified criteria for the granting of a Special Permit. Numerous other uses, such as museums, nursery schools, hotels, funeral chapels and commercial recreation facilities were allowed on lots of less than five acres and in non-residential zones. Those other uses were either allowed as of right or permitted as a Conditional Use with specified standards and not a Special Permit.