Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The legalization of sports betting and the licensure of such rights to new tech market players is redefining sports media and sports law. As a result, contract negotiations are becoming increasingly complex and requiring parties to consider an evolving set of nuanced issues.
This trend — which began to emerge following the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association, 138 S. Ct. 1461 (2018), to strike down the Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act of 1992 and open the floodgates to allow states to legalize sports betting — reached epic proportions in recent months. The past several alone have brought an unprecedented boom in sports media industry transactions, including:
Based on my experience since 1995 at the center of the convergence of technology within the sports and entertainment industries, commencing with the Internet and dot-com boom, I can say there's not much I haven't seen — and without a doubt, I have never witnessed this degree of activity and change within the industry in such a short time frame.
As the name suggests, sports betting rights are needed by sports betting books to market and build applications that take physical and virtual sports bets. By definition, these rights typically are a bundle of licenses comprised of game data rights, historical game-data rights, game video-transmission rights and trademark usage rights, commonly collectively sublicensed from sports data tech companies that have acquired the official rights directly from sports federations, leagues, conferences and teams and often with global exclusivity.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.