Baron Cohen Lawyers on Winning Ruling In Judge Moore's Defamation Suit

Federal District Judge John Cronan of the Southern District of New York recently ruled that a release Judge Moore signed prior to his appearance on the program barred precisely the sorts of claims he was bringing. Southern District Judge Cronan further found the First Amendment applied to claims brought by Moore's wife Kayla, who was not party to the release, on the ground that the bit "was clearly a joke and no reasonable viewer would have seen it otherwise" and that it "was commentary on matters of public concern." Moore v. Cohen, 19 Civ. 4977.

[The consent agreement Judge Moore signed stated he "specifically, but without limitation, waives, and agrees not to bring at any time in the future, any claims against the Producer, or against any of its assignees or licensees or anyone associated with the Program, which are related to the Program or its production, or this agreement, including, but not limited to, claims involving assertions of … (h) infliction of emotional distress (whether allegedly intentional or negligent), … (m) defamation (such as any allegedly false statements made in the Program), … (p) fraud (such as any alleged deception about the Program or this consent agreement)…." Judge Moore had struck from the release's "(f) intrusion or invasion of privacy" waiver language the words "such as any allegedly sexual-oriented or offensive behavior or questioning," but District Judge Cronan noted that was "an entirely different potential cause of action" and that "Judge Moore has not brought such a claim" in the litigation.]