Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
August 01, 2021

Intermediate Access Theory Rejected in Copyright Infringement Lawsuit Over Home-Renovation TV Show

The U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado granted a defense motion for summary judgment in a lawsuit brought by actress Melanie Tolbert, who alleged the HGTV home-renovation series Good Bones infringed on the sizzle reel for her Like Mother, Like Daughter that she created and circulated in the TV industry. Tolbert v. High Noon Productions LLC, 1:20-cv-01734.

Finding Tolbert failed to establish Good Bones producer High Noon had access to her proposed show, District Judge Daniel D. Domenico observed: "Tolbert has not alleged that she sent her teaser to High Noon, HGTV, or any of their agents or employees. Ms. Tolbert avers instead that she sent her teaser to twenty show producers in the home-renovation genre during the summer of 2014." Tolbert argued that High Noon had access to her work via those producers. But District Judge Domenico found: "While it is possible to establish access on an intermediary theory like the one posited by Ms. Tolbert, one leading treatise explains that it is 'seldom successful in practice.' William F. Patry, Patry on Copyright §9:29 (2021). This is because 'inserting a third party into the equation makes the likelihood of access even more remote since an additional obstacle is placed in the chain of evidence necessary to establish … that the defendant copied from the plaintiff.'" The district judge added: "Courts in the Ninth Circuit, for example, have ruled that, to prove access through an intermediary, 'the intermediary must have been either (1) a supervisor with responsibility for the defendant's project; (2) a part of the same work unit as the copier; or (3) someone who contributed creative ideas or material to the defendant's work." High Noon had moved for sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure on the ground that Tolbert's complaint "was legally and factually frivolous from the outset, asserted to exact a settlement."

But Judge Domenico denied the motion. "[N]ot every claim that fails is frivolous, and in the Court's view, the claims here weren't frivolous," the judge explained. "No doubt this sort of they-stole-my-show claim can be abused. But while there is not enough in the record to support the inferences and conclusions necessary for Ms. Tolbert to prevail, there is enough that a reasonable attorney could press them in good faith. Without discovery, for example, it's unclear how Ms. Tolbert would have known when [High Noon's] sizzle reel for Good Bones was completed. And even so, Ms. Tolbert has a colorable argument that High Noon could have copied her teaser in the period between completion of the sizzle reel and production of the [Good Bones] pilot."

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?